Publication of CCTV image of child does not breach right to private life

As part of a police campaign designed to identify individuals suspected of involvement in criminal activities a CCTV image of the appellant at age 14 was published. The Supreme Court ruled that this was not a breach of the appellant’s right to respect for his private life under Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

The judges disagreed on whether publication of the image interfered with the appellant’s human rights. However, they were unanimous in holding that, had there been an interference, it was justified on the basis that it was necessary for the administration of justice.

They also said that the police were entitled to disclose the image under the Data Protection Act as the publication was for the purposes of the prevention and detection of crime and the apprehension and prosecution of offenders.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s